is not alone in examining the use of NSO spyware. ![]() intel agencies, the White House let it be known that any attempt by American defense firms to buy the spyware would meet with stiff resistance. Following the unexpected revelation that American defense contractor 元Harris was also in talks to purchase NSO Group’s spyware, with the reported support of some U.S. ![]() The stiff-arming by the U.S., and other political controversies, created turmoil at the surveillance giant, prompting it to enter talks to sell out to a company run by ex-U.S. The following month, in December 2021, Congress, in passing its annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), included a provision in that bill mandating that the State Department submit a spyware company list annually to Congress for five years. ![]() companies from doing business with the Israeli spyware purveyor, judging it as a national security risk, an action that NSO has seemingly tried to reverse. Commerce Department put NSO Group on its entity list that bans U.S. Defense contractor’s bid to buy spyware accelerated action The evidence is increasingly hard to ignore, which has prompted the Biden administration and Congress to take limited steps to curtail the abuses of foreign spyware. government has done little to address this crisis. Despite the mounting evidence that invasive spyware apps such as NSO Group’s Pegasus software are used somewhat indiscriminately by despotic regimes against political foes, the U.S. ![]() House Intelligence Committee is holding a rare open public hearing today to discuss the proliferating and increasingly troublesome threats from foreign spyware.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |